You are about to report a comment. Once reported, the comment will be sent to our moderation team. If the moderation team feel the comment is inappropriate, it will be removed.
Ralph W. Lambrecht
01 November 2009
Kris is right. The quality of the film scanner used can make all the difference, and an ISO 400 film is not exactly know for it detail and clarity. The test result would have been totally different when comparing the best affordable digital equipment to the best film equipment and materials. I think this qualifies more as a comparison between a film scanner (unfortunately not named) and a very expensive digital SLR.
Report comment
You are about to report a comment. Once reported, the comment will be sent to our moderation team. If the moderation team feel the comment is inappropriate, it will be removed.
Ralph W. Lambrecht
01 November 2009
Kris is right. The quality of the film scanner used can make all the difference, and an ISO 400 film is not exactly know for it detail and clarity. The test result would have been totally different when comparing the best affordable digital equipment to the best film equipment and materials. I think this qualifies more as a comparison between a film scanner (unfortunately not named) and a very expensive digital SLR.
Report a comment